# <!-- METAHEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"*": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wefindx/schema/master/intent/oo-item.yaml"
# <!-- HEADER
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"base:title": "0oo - Ensuring Safe Arrival of Technological Singularity"
"og:title": "Ensuring Safe Arrival of Technological Singularity"
"og:description": "Most large organizations like corporations and countries today are trying to create their own A.I. However, corporations and countries have been observed to conduct unethically, and not benevolently to people. There is no guarantee of responsibility, sentience and friendliness of corporations in general. Moreover, it is not entirely clear what particular goal is a particular corporation’s automated business decision-making systems are driven by. We run a risk, that if some single corporation comes up with an A.I., that is better at survival than others, it out-competes all others, and spreads. So, instead of secretly doing one’s own personal or corporate …"
"og:image": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28134655"
"og:url": "/intent/11/"
"base:css": "/static/css/bootstrap.min.9c25540d6272.css"
"base:extra-css": "/static/css/base.57997aeac1df.css"
"base:favicon": "/static/favicon.acaa334f0136.ico"
"base:body_class": ""
"layout:logo": "/static/0oo.8d2a8bbef612.svg"
"layout:index": "/"
"layout:menu": "/menu/"
"layout:categories": "/intents/"
"layout:ideas": "/methods/"
"layout:projects": "/projects/"
"layout:users": "/users/"
"layout:about": "/about/"
"layout:help": "/help/"
"layout:bug_report": "https://github.com/wefindx/0oo"
"layout:login": "/accounts/login/"
"layout:light-off": "/darken/?darken=true"
"layout:set-multilingual": "/mulang/?mulang=true"
"layout:lang": "Language"
"layout:set-language-post-action": "/i18n/setlang/"
"layout:csrf-token": "0Sy8nuZ58Utg7rYO4QYZsdBL8Kc6bMeE2fTEvmmIZSlLYWaxpACpg6VkqJqubTJE"
"layout:input-next": "/intent/11/"
"layout:languages": [{"code": "ja", "is-active": "false", "name": "日本語"}, {"code": "lt", "is-active": "false", "name": "Lietuviškai"}, {"code": "zh-hans", "is-active": "false", "name": "简体中文"}, {"code": "en", "is-active": "true", "name": "English"}, {"code": "ru", "is-active": "false", "name": "Русский"}, {"code": "oo", "is-active": "false", "name": "O;o,"}]
# <!-- TOPIC
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:parent:intents": [{"title": "Technology", "url": "/intent/924/"}, {"title": "Existential Risk", "url": "/intent/1114/"}]
"item:title": ".:lt:Technologinio singuliarumo saugumas.:en:Ensuring Safe Arrival of Technological Singularity.:cn:技术奇点安全性"
"item:votes": +1
"item:add-vote": "#addnote"
"item:intent": "/intent/11/?l=en"
"item:base-administration": false
"item:body": |
    .:lt
    Dauguma didelių organizacijų, kaip kad korporacijos ir valstybės šiais laikais bando sukurti savo dirbtinį intelektą.
    
    Deja, kaip žinome iš istorijos, korporacijos ir valstybės ne visuomet elgiasi etiškai, ir nebūtinai geranoriškai žmonių atžvilgiu. Bendru atveju nėra garantijos, kad korporacijos bus atsakingos, emptaiškos ir draugiškos žmonėms. Be to, nėra visiškai aišku, kokių tikslų korporacijų automatizuoto verslo sprendimų priėmimo sprendimos siekia.
    
    Tagi, mes rizikuojame tuo, kad viena kokia nors korporacija išras dirbtinį intelektą, kuris turės gebėjimą išlikti geriau nei kiti, nukonkuruos visus kitus, ir išplis (kaip rodo [gyvybės evoliucijos simuliacijos](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F17_KiAZOxg&t=7m40s)) (žr. 60 sekudnžių).
    
    Tad, vietoje to, kad užsidarę slaptai kurtume sistemas pasiekti savo asmeninių tikslų, ar savo korporacijų tikslų, [manau](http://www.sl4.org/archive/1010/21019.html), dėl bendros gerovės, kad sukurtume draugišką žmogui dirbtinį intelektą, būtų kur kas geriau sukurti viešą, atviro kodo rizikos valdymo ir planavimo sistemą, kuri būtų priimtina visiems, suprasta visų, ir norima visų žmonių.
    .:en
    Most large organizations like corporations and countries today are trying to create their own A.I.
    
    However, corporations and countries have been observed to conduct unethically, and not benevolently to people. There is no guarantee of responsibility, sentience and friendliness of corporations in general. Moreover, it is not entirely clear what particular goal is a particular corporation’s automated business decision-making systems are driven by.
    
    We run a risk, that if some single corporation comes up with an A.I., that is better at survival than others, it out-competes all others, and spreads.
    
    So, instead of secretly doing one’s own personal or corporate system to achieve its goals, [I think](http://www.sl4.org/archive/1010/21019.html), for the sake of creating a friendly A.I., it could be much better to develop a public, open-source, risk management and planning system that’s acceptable, understood, and desired by all.
"item:permalink": "/intent/11/?l=en"
"item:source-date": ""
"item:owner": "Mindey"
"item:ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
"item:created": "2015-09-22T18:55:53.378000"
"item:intent:child:add": "/admin/hlog/intent/add/?parent=11"
# <!-- LINKS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:method:items":
  - "id": "i-115"
    "title": "Financial Think-Tank (&quot;Fintank&quot;)"
    "summary": "Public self-explanatory, inter-lingual, financial, programmable, hierarchical think-tank"
    "url": "/method/115/"
    "owner": "Mindey"
    "permalink": "/intent/11/?l=en#i-115"
    "ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
    "created": "2015-08-18T13:55:23.450000"
"item:method:add": "/admin/hlog/method/add/?parent=11"
"item:comment:add": "/intents/addnote?parent=11"
"item:comment:add:csrf_token": "0Sy8nuZ58Utg7rYO4QYZsdBL8Kc6bMeE2fTEvmmIZSlLYWaxpACpg6VkqJqubTJE"
"item:comment:form": |
    <li> <textarea name="text" cols="40" rows="10" id="addnote" class="comment-textarea" required>
    </textarea></li>
    <li><label for="id_vote">Vote:</label> <select name="vote" id="id_vote">
      <option value="-1">[−]</option>
      <option value="0" selected>-</option>
      <option value="1">[+]</option>
    </select></li>
    <li><label for="id_crawl">Silently:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="crawl" onchange="handleSilently(this)" id="id_crawl"></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_questions">Questions:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_questions" id="id_has_questions"> <span class="helptext">Mark if the comment raises new questions.</span></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_ideas">Ideas:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_ideas" id="id_has_ideas"> <span class="helptext">Mark if the comment contributes potential solutions.</span></li>
    <li><label for="id_has_facts">Facts:</label> <input type="checkbox" name="has_facts" id="id_has_facts"> <span class="helptext">Mark if the comment contributes facts for reasoning.</span></li>
    <a href="/accounts/login/">Please, <u>log in</u>.</a>
# <!-- COMMENTS
# –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– -->
"item:comment:items":
  - "id": "r-9"
    "text": |
        So, now, the Homebase is an attempt at that as well. We lack here markets, which is important part of the whole world's business. The markets part actually is in the making, pretty much by everyone in every different niches, though I have some ideas for that, too, which I'll describe a bit later.
    "owner": "Mindey"
    "ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey"
    "permalink": "/intent/11/?l=en#r-9"
    "created": "2020-03-03T19:54:38.827000"
    "vote": ""
"base:js": "/static/js/base.c7357c06cc89.js"